Skip to main content
Conditional Allele Architecture

LoxP Site Design

Since 1998, ingenious targeting laboratory has designed and implemented LoxP sites in over 1,500 conditional alleles, establishing precise frameworks for Cre mediated recombination that enable spatial and temporal control of gene expression.

LoxP site design determines the success of conditional knockout and knockin strategies. Proper positioning ensures normal gene function prior to exposure to Cre.

1,500+
Conditional Alleles
800+
Publications
26+
Years Experience
100%
Success Rate

LoxP Site Structure

The LoxP sequence is a 34 base pair DNA element recognized by Cre recombinase:

ATAACTTCGTATA GCATACAT TATACGAAGTTAT

Inverted Repeats

Size: 13 bp each

Function: Cre binding sites

Spacer Region

Size: 8 bp

Function: Determines orientation and outcome

Positioning Guidelines

Distance from Splice Sites

At least 100 to 200 bp from exon boundaries to avoid disrupting splicing

Avoid Regulatory Elements

Introns contain enhancers, silencers, and branch points that must be avoided

Minimum Floxed Region

500 bp to 5 kb optimal; regions under 200 bp reduce efficiency

Maximum Floxed Region

Regions over 10 kb can recombine but with decreased efficiency

Common Design Patterns

Single Exon Floxing

Simplest approach when one exon contains catalytic domain, is in all isoforms, and deletion causes frameshift

Multi Exon Floxing

Required when gene has multiple functional domains, single exon maintains frame, or isoform specific exons exist

First Coding Exon

Can eliminate all downstream sequence and possibility of truncated functional proteins.

Common Design Pitfalls

Hypomorphic Alleles

Cause: LoxP sites or cassette disrupt regulatory elements before Cre exposure

Prevention: Careful intronic placement. Test floxed allele homozygotes for normal phenotype.

Incomplete Null After Recombination

Cause: Floxed exon not essential, alternative splicing bypasses region, or in frame deletion preserves function

Prevention: Thorough gene structure analysis. Target functionally essential domains.

Inefficient Recombination

Cause: LoxP sites too close together, chromatin inaccessibility, or low Cre expression

Prevention: Optimal spacing (500 bp to 5 kb). Use robust Cre drivers.

What Researchers Say

I've been working with iTL over the past 5 years in the production of 3 different genetically altered mice. Not only did iTL help in the design of the mice, but the entire process was transparent with the opportunity at any time along the way to discuss my questions or concerns with scientists who had significant insight into the process. The mice were delivered on time, as billed!

Raghu Mirmira, MD, PhD

University of Chicago

Start Your LoxP Design Project

Our scientific team evaluates each gene for LoxP placement, including gene structure review, exon essentiality analysis, and frameshift verification.

Frequently asked questions

LoxP sites should be placed in introns flanking the exon to be deleted, avoiding placement within exons or too close to splice sites. Sites should be at least 100 to 200 bp from exon boundaries to avoid interfering with splicing. The floxed exon should encode critical functional domains.

LoxP sites can efficiently recombine when separated by distances from a few hundred base pairs to several kilobases. Very large floxed regions (10+ kb) may show reduced efficiency. Standard floxed exons are typically 100 to 500 bp, with intronic LoxP sites placed appropriately.

Yes. LoxP variant sites (lox2272, loxN) enable independent recombination events in the same construct for serial deletions, inversions, or dual recombinase strategies. Standard LoxP is preferred for most applications as variant sites require compatible Cre variants.

Related resources